pak ki ma ki ******
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Saturday, March 26, 2011
Monday, February 7, 2011
Something About "Pakistan"
Pakistan also called Porkistan is a Country located in south Asia having boundries with India(east),Afganistan(north), Indian Ocean(South),Iran(west). Pakistan was formed on 14 august 1947, after the partition of India.
Pakistan is well known for its export of terrorism. Their leaders are known for their curruption and lies.
its the worst time for the whole world when pakistan came into existance. Well if think deeply, pakistan don't have anything which can be called their own.
Land: pakistan was formed by partition of India, so they don't have their land. They borrowed from India.
Language: Pakistani people speaks "urdu". Which is a rubbish as it is the combination of Hindi(or Devanagri) and Arabic so they don't even have their language.
Ancestor of paki's : Pakistani people was once Indian Hindus. After the attack from the west many hundreds of years ago by Muslims. They forcefully converted hindus to muslims. These Indian muslims demanded for seperate Islamic pakistan in 1947. So, they are Hindus from Blood.
That's why we should say : "pakistan sucks"
Pakistan is well known for its export of terrorism. Their leaders are known for their curruption and lies.
its the worst time for the whole world when pakistan came into existance. Well if think deeply, pakistan don't have anything which can be called their own.
Land: pakistan was formed by partition of India, so they don't have their land. They borrowed from India.
Language: Pakistani people speaks "urdu". Which is a rubbish as it is the combination of Hindi(or Devanagri) and Arabic so they don't even have their language.
Ancestor of paki's : Pakistani people was once Indian Hindus. After the attack from the west many hundreds of years ago by Muslims. They forcefully converted hindus to muslims. These Indian muslims demanded for seperate Islamic pakistan in 1947. So, they are Hindus from Blood.
That's why we should say : "pakistan sucks"
Saturday, January 22, 2011
pakistani General resumes "we started war"
this is the video not shown by Indian or any other countries newsd channels but by pakistan's own DAWN news channel.
Some people who don't know the fact that :
"Most of the pakistani's thought that all the wars between India and pakistan was initiated by India".
But in this video a pakistani general A Khan telling truth to the pakistani's that thier government was always wrong.
Some people who don't know the fact that :
"Most of the pakistani's thought that all the wars between India and pakistan was initiated by India".
But in this video a pakistani general A Khan telling truth to the pakistani's that thier government was always wrong.
Kumble's 10 wicket haul against pak
India vs pakistan test in which Anil kumble took all 10 wickets of pakistan.
pakistan army surrenders 3 times
pak army surrenders to Indian army during KARGIL war, pakistani army officers takes his dead soldiers bodies.
pak army surrenders to Indian army during 1971 war, in Dhaka. Indian army captured Dhaka and 90,000 pakistani soldiers as war prisoners. Later released by India in Shimla summit(biggest mistake).
Proof of India winning 1965 war
there are not much videos related to India pakistan war of 1965. but these are independent views of people worldwide, taken from wikipedia
see complete story on Wikipedia.
1965 war on wikipedia
pak army surrenders to Indian army during 1971 war, in Dhaka. Indian army captured Dhaka and 90,000 pakistani soldiers as war prisoners. Later released by India in Shimla summit(biggest mistake).
Proof of India winning 1965 war
there are not much videos related to India pakistan war of 1965. but these are independent views of people worldwide, taken from wikipedia
- According to the Library of Congress Country Studies conducted by the Federal Research Division of the United States[53] —
The war was militarily inconclusive; each side held prisoners and some territory belonging to the other. Losses were relatively heavy—on the Pakistani side, twenty aircraft, 200 tanks, and 3,800 troops. Pakistan's army had been able to withstand Indian pressure, but a continuation of the fighting would only have led to further losses and ultimate defeat for Pakistan. Most Pakistanis, schooled in the belief of their own martial prowess, refused to accept the possibility of their country's military defeat by "Hindu India" and were, instead, quick to blame their failure to attain their military aims on what they considered to be the ineptitude of Ayub Khan and his government.
- TIME magazine reported that India held 690 mi2 of Pakistan territory while Pakistan held 250 mi2 of Indian territory in Kashmir and Rajasthan. Additionally, Pakistan had lost almost half its armour temporarily.[54] The article further elaborates —
Severely mauled by the larger Indian armed forces, Pakistan could continue the fight only by teaming up with Red China and turning its back on the U.N.
- Devin T. Hagerty wrote in his book "South Asia in world politics"[55] –
The invading Indian forces outfought their Pakistani counterparts and halted their attack on the outskirts of Lahore, Pakistan's second-largest city. By the time United Nations intervened on September 22, Pakistan had suffered a clear defeat.
- In his book "National identity and geopolitical visions",[56] Gertjan Dijkink writes –
The superior Indian forces, however, won a decisive victory and the army could have even marched on into Pakistani territory had external pressure not forced both combatants to cease their war efforts.
- An excerpt from Stanley Wolpert's India,[57] summarizing the Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 —
In three weeks the second Indo-Pak War ended in what appeared to be a draw when the embargo placed by Washington on U.S. ammunition and replacements for both armies forced cessation of conflict before either side won a clear victory. India, however, was in a position to inflict grave damage to, if not capture, Pakistan's capital of the Punjab when the cease-fire was called, and controlled Kashmir's strategic Uri-Poonch bulge, much to Ayub's chagrin.
- In his book titled The greater game: India's race with destiny and China, David Van Praagh wrote[58] –
India won the war. It gained 1,840 square kilometers of Pakistani territory: 640 square kilometers in Azad Kashmir, Pakistan's portion of the state; 460 square kilometers of the Sailkot sector; 380 square kilometers far to the south of Sindh; and most critical, 360 square kilometers on the Lahore front. Pakistan took 540 square kilometers of Indian territory: 490 square kilometers in the Chhamb sector and 50 square kilometers around Khem Karan.
- Dennis Kux's "India and the United States estranged democracies" also provides a summary of the war[59] —
Although both sides lost heavily in men and material, and neither gained a decisive military advantage, India had the better of the war. New Delhi achieved its basic goal of thwarting Pakistan's attempt to seize Kashmir by force. Pakistan gained nothing from a conflict which it had instigated.
- "A region in turmoil: South Asian conflicts since 1947" by Robert Johnson mentions[60] –
India's strategic aims were modest – it aimed to deny Pakistani Army victory, although it ended up in possession of 720 square miles (1,900 km2) of Pakistani territory for the loss of just 220 square miles (570 km2) of its own.
- An excerpt from William M. Carpenter and David G. Wiencek's "Asian security handbook: terrorism and the new security environment"[61] –
A brief but furious 1965 war with India began with a covert Pakistani thrust across the Kashmiri cease-fire line and ended up with the city of Lahore threatened with encirclement by Indian Army. Another UN-sponsored cease-fire left borders unchanged, but Pakistan's vulnerability had again been exposed.
The 1965 Indo-Pak war lasted barely a month. Pakistan made gains in the Rajasthan desert but its main push against India's Jammu-Srinagar road link was repulsed and Indian tanks advanced to within a sight of Lahore. Both sides claimed victory but India had most to celebrate.
- Uk Heo and Shale Asher Horowitz write in their book "Conflict in Asia: Korea, China-Taiwan, and India-Pakistan"[63] –
Again India appeared, logistically at least, to be in a superior position but neither side was able to mobilize enough strength to gain a decisive victory.
- Newsweek magazine, however, praised the Pakistani military's ability to hold of the much larger Indian Army.[64]
By just the end of the week, in fact, it was clear that the Pakistanis were more than holding their own.
see complete story on Wikipedia.
1965 war on wikipedia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)